PIKA RESUME — STATE OF RESUMES MEDIA ANGLE
Angle ID: eight-checks
Title: Eight diagnostic checks, not one verdict
Audience: Career educators and data journalists

Snapshot timestamp: 2026-10-31T13:01:14.138Z
Methodology reviewed: September 12, 2026 (2026-09-12)
Coverage: 2026-05-04T14:21:44.032Z to 2026-10-31T13:01:06.870Z
Unit of analysis: successful_ats_diagnostic_scan; repeat scans may be included.
Eligible scans are completed Pika diagnostics scored 1–100, non-deleted and non-watermarked. Counts are not one unique person, document, application, or outcome. Repeat scans and document or job-description variants may be included.
Minimum reportable sample: 30 scans. Rates, averages, and profiles below this floor are withheld.

CITATION-READY FINDING
Among 5,522 recent eligible successful scans containing all 8 canonical Pika checks, the average cleanly passed 2.7 checks.

EVIDENCE
- Average clean passes: 2.7 out of 8 canonical checks; n=5,522.

METRIC-SPECIFIC DENOMINATORS
- Average clean passes: 5,522 recent eligible successful scans containing all 8 canonical checks, not all 226,923 scans.

PUBLIC JSON SOURCE FIELDS
- aggregateData.checksProfile.avgPassed
- aggregateData.checksProfile.totalChecks
- aggregateData.checksProfile.sampleSize
- aggregateData.meta.profileSampleLimit
- aggregateData.meta.checksProfileEligibility

LIMITATIONS
Only scans containing all eight canonical Pika checks enter this profile. Rounded clean-sweep percentages do not establish that literally nobody passed every check.
Section and check-profile metrics use the latest eligible successful scans, capped at 10,000; the published sample for each metric is its relevant denominator. The checks profile further requires all eight canonical checks.
Self-selected successful Pika ATS diagnostic scans; repeat scans and variants may be included, so counts are not unique people, documents, or applications. The data is not representative of every applicant, employer, or ATS.
Pika diagnostic scores and flags do not measure employer rejection, callbacks, interviews, or hiring outcomes. No country- or role-specific result is claimed.
Scores reflect the Pika rubric in use when each scan ran. Until scoring versions are stored with historical results, score trends are product telemetry and must not be treated as comparable evidence of labour-market change.
Published percentages are rounded; zero displayed percentages must not be interpreted as exact zero counts.

EDITORIAL ASK
Show how multiple checks complement the headline score without inferring employability.

CITATION
Pika Resume. “Resume Statistics & ATS Score Benchmarks 2026: The State of Resumes.” Updated October 31, 2026. Aggregate dataset of 226,923 successful Pika ATS diagnostic scans. https://pikaresume.com/state-of-resumes

SOURCE AND ASSETS
Study: https://pikaresume.com/state-of-resumes
JSON: https://pikaresume.com/state-of-resumes/data.json
CSV: https://pikaresume.com/state-of-resumes/data.csv
Chart: https://pikaresume.com/state-of-resumes/charts/eight-check-profile.svg
Methodology: https://pikaresume.com/research-methodology

PUBLISHER DISCLOSURE
Pika Resume publishes this first-party product-diagnostic dataset and sells resume tools. This is not an independent audit of employer ATS systems.
Media contact: support@pikaresume.com
Refresh the public snapshot and verify the exact recipient, wording, and channel before any approved outreach.